(Bus) Strike

I'd be lying if I said the new-urbanist in me wasn't just the least bit tickled by the plight of suburban Ottawaians during the current transit strike; but the environmentalist in me is equally appalled, so it balances out.

The City of Ottawa is currently embroiled in a six-day-old transit strike, that is looking like it could easily last until the new year. This, coupled with Christmas shopping and heavy snowfall has made for some very frustrated commuters.

The Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU), representing OC Transpo drivers, mechanics, and others associated with public transit in the city, have been on strike since last Wednesday. This call to the picket lines corresponded with the first big snowfall of the winter, which snarled traffic, and increased transit times ten-fold for some people, while stranding many without cars. Perhaps intentional, perhaps unfortunate, but that perfect storm left many unsympathetic to the striking workers. Making things worse is the picket lines themselves around the city, where they restrict access to certain parking lots, adding up to an additional forty minutes on to an already extensive commute, and resulting in more than one incident of drivers intentionally hitting picketers with cars.

At the heart of the matter isn't money, but rather control. Control over scheduling, that is. Without fully understanding the intricacies of transit scheduling, my understanding goes something like this: under the current system the city lays our the routes and times, and then the drivers get to select their desired shifts. The drivers with the most seniority get to select first. The real difficulty comes with many of these being split-shifts revolving around the rush-hours. Many shifts are only three or four hours long, and most are during regular commuter times. What the city wants to do it be able to schedule the drivers as they see fit into these slots, which could result in a driver starting their day at 8:00am and not finishing until 9:00pm, but with three hours off in between somewhere. This represents less quality/family time for the drivers, but $3.4 million in annual savings for the city (CBC, 15 Dec 2008).

Both the city and the drivers are represented by abrasive men to whom open-mindedness does not come easily. A self-made millionaire with no political experience rode a wave of rural-populism and a 'zero-means-zero' tax-increase message to Ottawa's mayoral chair in the 2006 municipal elections. Larry O'Brien has since quashed a light-rail public transportation plan; given himself and then rescinded that same pay raise; made disparaging remarks about homeless people; and been formally charged with bribery under the Criminal Code of Canada by the OPP for his actions in the election. He has also most recently lost a budget vote, and been forced to raise taxes a whopping 4.9% higher than zero. He believes he can run a city like a business, and has been looking to correct inefficiencies in the bureaucratic machine since is inauguration (not altogether a bad thing). However, I'm sure these pinko unionists concerned about 'quality of life' just grind his gears, and he can't afford to lose this strike battle too.

On the other side is André Cornellier; a seemingly militant unionist who would throw himself under a bus if it meant protecting his drivers (not altogether a bad thing). He recently fiercely defended a driver who left a young mother at the curb while he drove off with her two-year old on board after an argument about strollers. ("The mean bus driver took me away from mommy," said the tabloid Ottawa Citizen's front page.) Cornellier has recently offered up a couple of whoppers, appearing brash and unsympathetic, and not doing himself any favours. In an interview with CTV, the following exchange occurred:
CTV- "Will you be giving your membership an opportunity to see the offer and vote on it tonight before midnight?"
AC-"No."
*pause*
CTV-"Why not?"
AC-"Why?"
When asked about the delay caused by picketers, he said: "It's about... inconveniencing people. What's wrong with that?
For more: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkBIsGTlUT8&watch_response).

So now the city hangs in the balance. People are forced to find other ways to get around, and business owners are losing many customers at this vital time in a sagging economy. Freezing rain tonight, and calls for temperatures as high as 4°C Monday and as low as -9°C Tuesday, which will only result in icy slush, and we're all stuck watching two petty men duke it out (by duke it out I mean not talk to each other). I guess watching Harper try and save a measly $30 million at the expensive of the financial well-being of all of his opponents inspired O'Brien to try and save a measly $3.4 million at the expense of the contentment of oft-underappreciated employees who take a lot of abuse and make the city run. That said, calling a strike on the eve of the first big snowfall and right before the Christmas season, while being represented by a man who wears his callous disregard for everybody else like a badge of honour is not the best way to rally public sympathy. In the end really everybody loses, except for the cabs, and perhaps the new-urbanists. And this perfect storm is looking like it could go the distance.

RM